I benchmarked the comparison in speed between variable functions, call_user_func, and eval. My results are below:
Variable functions took 0.125958204269 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.485446929932 seconds.
eval took 2.78526711464 seconds.
This was run on a Compaq Proliant server, 180MHz Pentium Pro 256MB RAM. Code is as follows:
<?php
function fa () { return 1; }
function fb () { return 1; }
function fc () { return 1; }
$calla = 'fa';
$callb = 'fb';
$callc = 'fc';
$time = microtime( true );
for( $i = 5000; $i--; ) {
$x = 0;
$x += $calla();
$x += $callb();
$x += $callc();
if( $x != 3 ) die( 'Bad numbers' );
}
echo( "Variable functions took " . (microtime( true ) - $time) . " seconds.<br />" );
$time = microtime( true );
for( $i = 5000; $i--; ) {
$x = 0;
$x += call_user_func('fa', '');
$x += call_user_func('fb', '');
$x += call_user_func('fc', '');
if( $x != 3 ) die( 'Bad numbers' );
}
echo( "call_user_func took " . (microtime( true ) - $time) . " seconds.<br />" );
$time = microtime( true );
for( $i = 5000; $i--; ) {
$x = 0;
eval( '$x += ' . $calla . '();' );
eval( '$x += ' . $callb . '();' );
eval( '$x += ' . $callc . '();' );
if( $x != 3 ) die( 'Bad numbers' );
}
echo( "eval took " . (microtime( true ) - $time) . " seconds.<br />" );
?>
call_user_func
(PHP 4, PHP 5, PHP 7, PHP 8)
call_user_func — Call the callback given by the first parameter
Description
Calls the callback given by the first parameter and passes
the remaining parameters as arguments.
Parameters
-
callback -
The callable to be called.
-
args -
Zero or more parameters to be passed to the callback.
Note:
Note that the parameters for call_user_func() are not passed by reference.
Example #1 call_user_func() example and references
<?php
error_reporting(E_ALL);
function increment(&$var)
{
$var++;
}
$a = 0;
call_user_func('increment', $a);
echo $a."\n";
// it is possible to use this instead
call_user_func_array('increment', array(&$a));
echo $a."\n";
// it is also possible to use a variable function
$increment = 'increment';
$increment($a);
echo $a."\n";
?>The above example will output:
Warning: Parameter 1 to increment() expected to be a reference, value given in … 0 1 2
Return Values
Returns the return value of the callback.
Examples
Example #2 call_user_func() example
<?php
function barber($type)
{
echo "You wanted a $type haircut, no problem\n";
}
call_user_func('barber', "mushroom");
call_user_func('barber', "shave");
?>The above example will output:
You wanted a mushroom haircut, no problem You wanted a shave haircut, no problem
Example #3 call_user_func() using namespace name
<?php
namespace Foobar;
class Foo {
static public function test() {
print "Hello world!\n";
}
}
call_user_func(__NAMESPACE__ .'\Foo::test');
call_user_func(array(__NAMESPACE__ .'\Foo', 'test'));
?>The above example will output:
Hello world! Hello world!
Example #4 Using a class method with call_user_func()
<?php
class myclass {
static function say_hello()
{
echo "Hello!\n";
}
}
$classname = "myclass";
call_user_func(array($classname, 'say_hello'));
call_user_func($classname .'::say_hello');
$myobject = new myclass();
call_user_func(array($myobject, 'say_hello'));
?>The above example will output:
Hello! Hello! Hello!
Example #5 Using lambda function with call_user_func()
<?php
call_user_func(function($arg) { print "[$arg]\n"; }, 'test');
?>The above example will output:
[test]
Notes
Note:
Callbacks registered with functions such as call_user_func() and call_user_func_array() will not be called if there is an uncaught exception thrown in a previous callback.
See Also
- call_user_func_array() - Call a callback with an array of parameters
- is_callable() - Verify that a value can be called as a function from the current scope.
- Variable functions
- ReflectionFunction::invoke() - Invokes function
- ReflectionMethod::invoke() - Invoke
add a note
User Contributed Notes 31 notes
insta at citiesunlimited dot com ¶
18 years ago
gskluzacek dot nospam at gmail dot com ¶
14 years ago
if you simply want to dynamically call a method on an object it is not necessary to use call_user_function but instead you can do the following:
<?php
$method_name = "AMethodName";
$obj = new ClassName();
$obj->{$method_name}();
?>
I've used the above so I know it works.
Regards,
-- Greg
luciano_closs at hotmail dot com ¶
5 years ago
Actually, as PHP 7.0, when you want to call a static method, you must call:
<?php
namespace Foobar;
class Foo {
static public some() {
echo 'Hello World!';
}
}
call_user_func( array( __NAMESPACE__ . '\\Foo', 'some' ) );
?>
This will output:
Hello World!
fab2s at marsatak dot org ¶
7 years ago
@insta at citiesunlimited dot com & @Maresa
call_user_func() alleged slowness is quite over estimated when it comes to real use cases. we are talking about loosing fraction of a second every million calls, which by the way would take less than half a sec to execute in the worst case.
I don't know of many processes that would actually suffer from this kind of overhead.
Iterations: 100 000
Averaged over: 10
PHP 5.6.30 (cli) (built: Jan 18 2017 19:47:28)
Overall Average
+------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+
| Invocation | Time (s) | Delta (s) | % |
+------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+
| directFunction | 0.0089 | -0.0211 | -70.19 |
| directStatic | 0.0098 | -0.0202 | -67.39 |
| directLambda | 0.0109 | -0.0191 | -63.52 |
| directInstance | 0.0116 | -0.0184 | -61.31 |
| directClosure | 0.0150 | -0.0150 | -50.15 |
| Invoke | 0.0282 | -0.0018 | -6.13 |
| call_user_func | 0.0300 | | |
| ClosureFactory | 0.0316 | +0.0016 | +5.20 |
| assignedClosureFactory | 0.0328 | +0.0028 | +9.28 |
| call_user_func_array | 0.0399 | +0.0099 | +33.02 |
| InvokeCallUserFunc | 0.0418 | +0.0118 | +39.17 |
| directImplementation | 0.0475 | +0.0175 | +58.28 |
+------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+
Iterations: 100 000
Averaged over: 10
PHP 7.1.2 (cli) (built: Feb 14 2017 21:24:45)
Overall Average
+------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+
| Invocation | Time (s) | Delta (s) | % |
+------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+
| directFunction | 0.0043 | -0.0096 | -68.92 |
| directStatic | 0.0050 | -0.0089 | -64.04 |
| directInstance | 0.0058 | -0.0081 | -58.22 |
| directLambda | 0.0063 | -0.0075 | -54.44 |
| directClosure | 0.0081 | -0.0058 | -41.57 |
| call_user_func | 0.0139 | | |
| call_user_func_array | 0.0147 | +0.0008 | +5.84 |
| Invoke | 0.0187 | +0.0048 | +34.61 |
| ClosureFactory | 0.0207 | +0.0069 | +49.43 |
| assignedClosureFactory | 0.0219 | +0.0080 | +57.75 |
| directImplementation | 0.0232 | +0.0094 | +67.53 |
| InvokeCallUserFunc | 0.0264 | +0.0126 | +90.67 |
+------------------------+----------+-----------+--------+
If you want more details : https://github.com/fab2s/call_user_func
Nitrogen ¶
15 years ago
A good use for call_user_func(); is for recursive functions.
If you're distributing code, you will often come across users who will rename functions and break the code..
Use this: call_user_func(__FUNCTION__, ... ); inside a function to call itself with whatever parameters you want.
<?php
// example, an extremely simplified factorial calculator..
// it's quite obvious when someone renames the function, it'll spit out an error because it wants to call itself.
function Factorial($i=1) {
return($i==1?1:$i*Factorial($i-1));
}
// you can give this function whatever name you want, it'll always work, of course if you initially call it using the name you gave it.
function qwertyuiop($i=1) {
return($i==1?1:$i*call_user_func(__FUNCTION__,$i-1));
}
?>
Just that I didn't see any reference to recursive functions when user_call_func(); really helps.
Knightnet ¶
17 years ago
You don't need to use this function to call a variable class function. Instead you can do the following:
$this->{$fnname}();
The example works in PHP 5 from within the class. It is the {} that do the trick.
Regards,
Julian.
slinstj at gmail dot com ¶
6 years ago
Updating "insta at citiesunlimited dot com"'s benchmarking for PHP 7.1.17 we have an INVERSION of results between using variables and call_user_func():
// RESULTS
Variable functions took 0.0020599365234375 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.00094509124755859 seconds.
eval took 0.024421215057373 seconds.
So, call_user_func() is now actually the way to go in PHP 7.1+.
<?php
function fa () { return 1; }
function fb () { return 1; }
function fc () { return 1; }
$calla = 'fa';
$callb = 'fb';
$callc = 'fc';
$time = microtime( true );
for( $i = 5000; $i--; ) {
$x = 0;
$x += $calla();
$x += $callb();
$x += $callc();
if( $x != 3 ) die( 'Bad numbers' );
}
echo( "Variable functions took " . (microtime( true ) - $time) . " seconds.<br />" );
$time = microtime( true );
for( $i = 5000; $i--; ) {
$x = 0;
$x += call_user_func('fa', '');
$x += call_user_func('fb', '');
$x += call_user_func('fc', '');
if( $x != 3 ) die( 'Bad numbers' );
}
echo( "call_user_func took " . (microtime( true ) - $time) . " seconds.<br />" );
$time = microtime( true );
for( $i = 5000; $i--; ) {
$x = 0;
eval( '$x += ' . $calla . '();' );
eval( '$x += ' . $callb . '();' );
eval( '$x += ' . $callc . '();' );
if( $x != 3 ) die( 'Bad numbers' );
}
echo( "eval took " . (microtime( true ) - $time) . " seconds.<br />" );
?>
Marco ¶
19 years ago
>phil at gettcomm dot com
>22-May-2002 04:51
>if you need to get a reference back from a method, you can work around
>call_user_func()'s shortcomings like this:
>
Naaa! Having back a reference is a real problem, but it can be solved by mean of eval(), instead of using call_user_func:
<?php
class Node {
var $name;
var $child;
function Node ( $name ) { $this->name = $name; }
function &getChild () { return $this->child; }
}
$p = new Node ( 'Father' );
$c = new Node ( 'Child' );
$p->child = &$c;
eval ( "\\$cref = &\\$p->getChild ();" );
$cref->name = 'Another Child';
// Prints out 'Another Child'
echo "****** After eval c = " . $c->name . "\\n\\n";
?>
James at enfsolar dot com ¶
4 years ago
<?php
class MyClass{
public function hello($str)
{
echo 'hello ' . $str;
}
}
$obj = new MyClass();
[$obj, 'hello']('World'); // the array can be called as a function
edgar dot klerks at gmail dot com ¶
15 years ago
An entirely OO solution to add dynamicly methods to classes, I used in a project:
<?php
class ProductPart {
protected $data;
protected $plugins = array();
function __construct($data){
$this->data = $data;
}
public function register(ProductPlugin $plugin){
if(!in_array($plugin, $this->plugins)){
$this->plugins[$plugin->toString()] = $plugin;
} else {
throw new Exception('Function allready defined');
}
}
public function unregister(ProductPlugin $plugin){
if(isset($this->plugins[$plugin->toString()])){
unset($this->plugins[$plugin->toString()]);
} else {
throw new Exception('No such function');
}
}
protected function __call($method, $args) {
if(isset($this->plugins[$method])){
array_unshift(&$args, $this->data);
array_unshift(&$args, $this);
return $this->plugins[$method]->run($args[0], $args[1], $args[2]);
} else {
throw new Exception('No such function');
}
}
} ?>
I simplified the class somewhat for clearity.
With this class, you can dynamicly add and remove classes by calling register or unregister. Register will store the object in an associative array by calling toString (as defined by ProductPlugin) and saving the method under the returned string in the array. (In this case the name of the method the class adds.)
When a method is called, which isn't standard in the object, _call will lookup the called method in the array. If found, __call run the method of the plugin with the provided arguments. I restricted the user provided argument to 1, because I want to force the user to use associative arrays.
Because I chose an array to store my classes, removing a function is quite simple. However the unregister function isn't optimal, I better pass a string instead of a plugin object. I didn't test it yet on performance.
The ProductPlugin class:
<?php
abstract class ProductPlugin {
protected $name = null;
abstract public function run($obj, $data, $args);
public function __construct($data = null) {
if($this->name === null){
throw new Exception('Name must be defined');
}
$this->init($data);
}
protected function init($data){
}
public function toString(){
return $this->name;
}
}
?>
And at last some demonstration code:
<?php
$bla = new ProductPart(array('HelloWorld' => 'Hello world'));
$hello = new helloPlugin();
$bla->register($hello);
$bla->HelloWorld();
$bla->unregister($hello);
$bla->HelloWorld();
?>
fab2s at marsatak dot org ¶
7 years ago
The "Example #1 call_user_func() example and references" has become misleading since it will throw an exception starting from at least php 5.6.30:
<?php
// Parameter 1 to increment() expected to be a reference, value given
?>
The crash occurs when call_user_func() is called as it does not provide increment() with a reference.
Also note that :
<?php
call_user_func('increment', &$a);
?>
will also throw an exception :
<?php
// Call-time pass-by-reference has been removed
?>
dead,screamer@seznam,cz ¶
15 years ago
<?php call_user_func()?> and <?php call_user_func_array()?> hide some errors (notices, warnings and maybe errors), even if is display_errors turned on and error_Reporting is set to E_ALL|E_STRICT
Kris Koskelin ¶
20 years ago
I was trying to use this function to call a method of an already-instantiated object. I needed to do this with the object itself, not simply call the class' method.
To accomplish this, I really avoided this particular function altogether like this:
<?php
if ( method_exists($my_obj, $action) ){
return $my_obj->{$action}();
}
?>
I hope someone else finds this useful. Note that doing this allows you to pass params to the function more-or-less in the same way you would to any other class method.
dougqh at hotmail dot com ¶
22 years ago
The previous note I posted had an error in the source code. That has been corrected in this note.
Note, that returning by reference does not work properly when the function
is called using call_user_func.
This example illustrates the problem...
<?php
$globalVar = 0;
function &staticFunction()
{
global $globalVar;
return $globalVar;
}
$result =& call_user_func( "staticFunction" );
$result = 3;
print "result:" . $result . "<br/>\n";
print "globalVar: " . $globalVar . "<br/>\n";
$result2 =& staticFunction();
$result2 = 3;
print "result2: " . $result2 . "<br/>\n";
print "globalVar: " . $globalVar . "<br/>\n";
?>
The above code results in the following output ...
Note that $result is not a reference to $globalVar.
result:0
globalVar: 0
result2: 3
globalVar: 3
Also, the use of call_user_method is now deprecated in favor of passing
array( &$object, $method ) as the function to call_user_func. This is
reported when error reporting is set to E_ALL in the latest versions of
PHP.
danyloco at yahoo dot com ¶
23 years ago
I was trying to call multiple functions within a class, and after a brain frying experience this is what came out... hope it helps:
<?php
class Foo {
function hey1($id){echo "In hey1";}
function hey2($id){echo "In hey2";}
#... and so forth ...
function runtest($id) {
#the fun part :)
for($i=1; $i<=2; $i++) {
$fp = "hey".$i;
$this->$fp($id);
}
}
}
?>
It worked like a charm :).
blakerenton09 at yahoo dot com ¶
13 years ago
call_user_func may also be used to call a closure or anonymous function that has been passed into a user-defined function.
<?php
function Benchmark()
{
foreach(func_get_args() as $function)
{
$st = microtime(true);
call_user_func($function);
$et = microtime(true);
echo sprintf("Time: %f", $et - $st) . '<br />';
}
}
Benchmark(function()
{
for ( $i = 0; $i <= 10000; $i++ )
{ }
},
function()
{
$i = 0;
while ( $i <= 10000 )
{
$i++;
}
});
?>
Returns:
Time: 0.001652
Time: 0.001458
Maresa ¶
18 years ago
I tested the same code that insta at citiesunlimited dot com pasted on the following machines:
www1 machine:
OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE
CPU: 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.66GHz (2657.82-MHz 686-class CPU) with Hyperthreading
MEM: 1073217536 (1023 MB)
PHP 5.1.2 (cli)
PHP 4.4.1 (Web)
www2 machine:
OS: Linux version 2.6.14-gentoo-r5 Gentoo 3.4.3-r1, ssp-3.4.3-0, pie-8.7.7)
CPU: 2 x Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 265 stepping 02 1808.357 MHz
MEM: 2060388k total
PHP 5.1.2 (cli)
PHP Version 4.4.0-pl1-gentoo (web)
dev machine:
OS: Linux version 2.6.15-gentoo-r1 Gentoo 3.3.5.20050130-r1, ssp-3.3.5.20050130-1, pie-8.7.7.1
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.00GHz stepping 04
MEM: 516384k total,
PHP 4.4.0-pl1-gentoo (cli)
PHP Version 4.4.0-pl1-gentoo (web)
The result are as follows:
www1 - CLI
Variable functions took 0.012186050415 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.0300550460815 seconds.
eval took 0.17235994339 seconds.
www1 - Web
Variable functions took 0.017616 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.034926 seconds.
eval took 0.149618 seconds
www2 - CLI
Variable functions took 0.0065491199493408 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.019452095031738 seconds.
eval took 0.10734891891479 seconds.
www2 - Web
Variable functions took 0.01565 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.02613 seconds.
eval took 0.132258 seconds.
dev - CLI
Variable functions took 0.025176 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.047402 seconds.
eval took 0.168196 seconds.
dev - Web
Variable functions took 0.025465 seconds.
call_user_func took 0.049713 seconds.
eval took 0.20154 seconds.
On www1 - CLI, eval is about 14 times slower than calling function by using variable.
On www1 - Web, eval is about 8.5 times slower (hmm interesting. Perhaps PHP4 is faster calculating eval than PHP5)
On www2 - CLI, eval is about 16 times slower than calling function by using variable.
On www2 - Web, eval is about 8.5 times slower (about same result as www1)
On dev - CLI, eval is about 6.6 times slower than calling function by using variable.
On dev - Web, eval is about 8 times slower (about same result as www1)
On the dev machine, CLI and web version of PHP is the same. and their speed difference between calling function using variable or eval does not differ that much compare to PHP5 VS PHP5
rlansky at webroot dot com ¶
18 years ago
Based on the previous posts, it appears that using call_user_func can be serveral times slower than using variable substitution. I think these results are somewhat misleading.
I set up a similar test in which a static method of an object was called repeatedly in a loop. I got similar results to those seen; when calling the method using call_user_func the execution was twice that of calling the method directly. However, I then started adding some "meat" to the method in question. In my case, I found that what was constant was not the percentage change, but rather that there is a fixed cost to using call_user_func.
In my case, this fixed cost was 2 microseconds per call. When executing a method that performs no operations, this is a large percentage of the execution time for that method. However, when using this on a method that actually performs some work, the 2 microsecond cost is almost impossible to measure.
It seems to me that if you want to use call_user_func to call a very fast executing method, and you need to do this thousands of times, then you may want to reconsider. However, if you are using this to call methods that are not executed thousands of times, the small fixed cost of using php call_user_func is probably not an issue.
Michele.Manzato at verona.miz.it ¶
21 years ago
With overload()ed classes call_user_func_* calls real class methods only. If the method does not exist then PHP does not try with the "__call()" magic method (at least until PHP 4.3.3). See this:
<?php
class A
{
function A() {}
function __call($method, $args, &$ret) {
echo "__call(): You called '{$method}()'<br>\n";
return true;
}
function regular() {
echo "You called 'regular()'<br>\n";
}
};
overload("A");
$a = new A;
$a->regular(); // Works, calls regular()
call_user_func(array(&$a, "regular")); // Works, calls regular()
$a->hello(); // Works, calls __call()
call_user_func(array(&$a, "hello")); // Does NOT work!
?>
Maxdamantus ¶
17 years ago
Note that the parser can interpret variables in function syntax, which means you can pass all variables normally (eg: reference).
<?php
function myfunction($string, &$int){
echo $string."\n";
$int++;
}
$function_name = "myfunction";
$x = 1336;
$function_name("Hello World", $x);
echo $x;
?>
---
Hello World
1337
Carl ¶
21 years ago
I had a problem where I wanted to parameterize a callback. The end called was in an external class, but I needed to save some state for the callback that didn't make sense to keep in the original object, as it might change from call to call...
<?php
class foo
{
function foo()
{
$str = "Hello There";
$str2 = "Carl";
$that =& new holder($str);
call_user_func(array(&$that, 'callback'), $str2);
}
}
class holder
{
function holder($aParam)
{
$this->param = $aParam;
}
function callback($aStr)
{
echo "A=$this->param, B=$aStr\n";
}
}
?>
developer at nabtron dot com ¶
7 years ago
We can achieve the same dynamically without call_user_func like this
<?php
class myclass {
public function say_hello()
{
echo "Hello!\n";
}
}
$classname = "myclass";
$myobject = new myclass();
$var = "say_hello";
(new myclass)->{$var}();
call_user_func(array(new myclass(), $var));
jcastro at eftec dot cl ¶
8 years ago
Lets say that $a1 is an object and fn is a function then:
echo $a1->fn('hello world');
echo $a1->{"fn"}('hello world');
echo call_user_func(array($a1, 'fn'),'hello world');
Are three valid ways to do the same.
romainbessuges at gmail dot com ¶
13 years ago
I made a wrapper for call_user_func_array which is really simple and convenient. It takes advantage of the __invoke() magic method :
<?php
class Func {
public static function fromFunction($name){
return new Func($name);
}
public static function fromClassMethod($class, $name){
return new Func(array($class, $name));
}
public static function fromObjectMethod($object, $name){
return new Func(array($object, $name));
}
public $function;
public function __construct($function) {
$this->function = $function;
}
public function __invoke(){
return call_user_func_array($this->function, func_get_args());
}
}
?>
Example :
<?php
$func = Func::fromObjectMethod($myArrayObject, "offsetGet");
echo $func(3);
?>
moisadoru at gmail dot com ¶
14 years ago
Actually, when calling a static method of some class, the params are sent by reference:
<?php
class Foo {
private $x = 0;
public function getX(){
return $this->x;
}
public function setX($val){
$this->x = $val;
}
}
class Bar {
static function incStatic(Foo $f){
$f->setX($f->getX()+1);
global $foo;
if($f === $foo) echo '<span style="color: blue">' . __METHOD__ . '() objects are equal</span><br />';
else echo '<span style="color: red">' . __METHOD__ . '() objects are not equal</span><br />';
}
public function incNonStatic(Foo $f){
$f->setX($f->getX()+1);
if($f === $foo) echo '<span style="color: blue">' . __METHOD__ . '() objects are equal</span><br />';
else echo '<span style="color: red">' . __METHOD__ . '() objects are not equal</span><br />';
}
}
function inc(Foo $f){
$f->setX($f->getX()+1);
if($f === $foo) echo '<span style="color: blue">' . __FUNCTION__ . '() objects are equal</span><br />';
else echo '<span style="color: red">' . __FUNCTION__ . '() objects are not equal</span><br />';
}
$foo = new Foo;
$bar = new Bar;
call_user_func('inc', $foo);
call_user_func('Bar::incStatic', $foo);
call_user_func(array($bar, 'incNonStatic'), $foo);
?>
The results on PHP 5.2.6 (macosx 10.5):
inc() objects are not equal
Bar::incStatic() objects are equal
Bar::incNonStatic() objects are not equal
Hope it helps sombody.
Typer85 at gmail dot com ¶
18 years ago
I would just like to say at first that I prefer variable function calls over the use of this function.
However I found that at some times, the use of this function is needed in situtations where variable function calls can not be used. And in those same situations, the use of this function is also better than using eval.
The situation I ran into is this:
I wanted to call object methods dynamically from within the object but with arguments given for possible parameters that the method I will call requires.
The parameters themselves are dynamic, meaning I have no prior knowledge of how many their are, their values, or if they even exist.
Also because object methods are dynamic, meaning I have no prior knowledge which object method will actually be called, I can not simply use variable function calls, call the method and pass any parameters.
So what I simply do is call the object method with an array of parameters, something that, to the best of my knowledge, can not be done with variable function calls, since variable function calls, even though they themeselves are dynamic, passing parameters to them is not.
Anonymous ¶
19 years ago
<?php
/*
A very simple event handler dispose and change the latest one I did
*/
class Duke
{
//public:
var $m_pRaiser;
var $m_strRaiserFun;
var $m_objArgs;
//public:
function Duke( $pRaiser,
$strRaiserFun,
$objArgs )
{
$this ->m_pRaiser = $pRaiser;
$this ->m_strRaiserFun = $strRaiserFun;
$this ->m_objArgs = $objArgs;
}//end of constructor
}//end of class Duke
class A
{
//protected:
function OnEventHandler( $sender, $args )//virtual
{
$sender ->SayHello();
}//end of OnEventHandler( $sender, $args )
//public:
function OnEvent( $pDuke = null )
{
if( $pDuke == null )
{
call_user_func( array( &$this, "OnEventHandler" ), $this, null );
return;
}
call_user_func( array( $pDuke ->m_pRaiser, $pDuke ->m_strRaiserFun ), $pDuke ->m_pRaiser, $pDuke ->m_objArgs );
}//end of OnEvent( $pDuke )
function SayHello()//virtual
{
echo "A::SayHello" . "<br>";
}//end of SayHello()
}//end of class A
class B extends A
{
//public:
function SayHello()//override
{
echo "B::SayHello" . "<br>";
}//end of SayHello()
}//end of class B
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//Main import to test
//
$a = &new A();
$b = &new B();
$pDuke = &new Duke( $b, "OnEventHandler", null );
$b ->OnEvent();
$b ->OnEvent( $pDuke );
?>
zxy at estec-jp dot com ¶
19 years ago
A simple event handler dispose released by useful callback in PHP 4.x
<?php
class Duke
{
//public:
var $m_pRaiser;
var $m_strRaiserFun;
var $m_objArgs;
//public:
function Duke( $pRaiser,
$strRaiserFun,
$objArgs )
{
$this ->m_pRaiser = $pRaiser;
$this ->m_strRaiserFun = $strRaiserFun;
$this ->m_objArgs = $objArgs;
}//end of constructor
}//end of class Duke
class A
{
//protected:
function OnEventHandler( $sender, $args )//virtual
{
$sender ->SayHello();
}//end of OnEventHandler( $sender, $args )
//public:
function OnEvent( $pDuke )
{
call_user_func( array( $pDuke ->m_pRaiser, $pDuke ->m_strRaiserFun ), $pDuke ->m_pRaiser, $pDuke ->m_objArgs );
}//end of OnEvent( $pDuke )
function SayHello()//virtual
{
echo "A::SayHello" . "<br>";
}//end of SayHello()
}//end of class A
class B extends A
{
//public:
function SayHello()//override
{
echo "B::SayHello" . "<br>";
}//end of SayHello()
}//end of class B
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//Main import to test
//
$a = &new A();
$b = &new B();
$pDuke = &new Duke( $b, "SayHello", null );
$b ->OnEvent( $pDuke );
?>
arjini at mac dot com ¶
20 years ago
Some of the wierder examples below confused me, and made me think that the following would work (but it does!).
<?php
class barber{
function shop($one,$two,$three,$four='quartet'){
echo $one.','.$two.','.$three.','.$four;
}
}
$bsq = new barber;
call_user_func(array(&$bsq,'shop'),'one','two','three');
/* Output = one,two,three,quartet */
class bigBarber{
var $quartet;
function bigBarber(){
$this->quartet = 'four';
}
function shop($one,$two,$three,$five='quintet'){
echo $one.','.$two.','.$three.','.$this->quartet.','.$five;
}
}
$bbsq = new bigBarber();
call_user_func(array(&$bbsq,'shop'),'one','two','three');
/* Output = one,two,three,four,quintet */
?>
info at webseiteselberpflegen dot de ¶
19 years ago
It seems like call_user_func() can not be used to create Objects via the new Command.
The Following example dosen't work:
<?php
include_once(class_".$type.".php");
$object = new call_user_func ('bdv_'.$type);
?>
But this works:
<?php
include_once(class_".$type.".php");
$constr = 'bdv_'.$type;
$object = new $constr();
?>
