You CAN list all keys in the keyring, you only have to pass an empty string ''.
<?php
$gpg = new gnupg();
$info = $gpg -> keyinfo('');
print_r($info);
?>
That's it! ;)
gnupg_keyinfo
(PECL gnupg >= 0.1)
gnupg_keyinfo — Returns an array with information about all keys that matches the given pattern
설명
array gnupg_keyinfo
( resource
$identifier
, string $pattern
)인수
-
identifier -
gnupg_init()나 gnupg 호출로 생성되는 gnupg 식별자.
-
pattern -
The pattern being checked against the keys.
반환값
Returns an array with information about all keys that matches the given
pattern or FALSE, if an error has occurred.
예제
Example #1 Procedural gnupg_keyinfo() example
<?php
$res = gnupg_init();
$info = gnupg_keyinfo($res, 'test');
print_r($info);
?>
Example #2 OO gnupg_keyinfo() example
<?php
$gpg = new gnupg();
$info = $gpg -> keyinfo("test");
print_r($info);
?>
add a note
User Contributed Notes 3 notes
fauger at NOSPAM dot anonymous dot com ¶
11 years ago
gtisza at gmail dot com ¶
9 years ago
Returns an array of information blocks. An information block looks like
<?php
array (
'disabled' => <bool>,
'expired' => <bool>,
'revoked' => <bool>,
'is_secret' => <bool>,
'can_sign' => <bool>,
'can_encrypt' => <bool>,
'uids' => <array of uid blocks>,
'subkeys' => <array of subkey blocks>,
)
?>
An uid data block looks like
<?php
array (
'name' => <string>,
'comment' => <string>,
'email' => <string>,
'uid' => <string>,
'revoked' => <bool>,
'invalid' => <bool>,
)
?>
A subkey block looks like
<?php
array (
'fingerprint' => <string>,
'keyid' => <string>,
'timestamp' => <int>,
'expires' => <int>,
'is_secret' => <bool>,
'invalid' => <bool>,
'can_encrypt' => <bool>,
'can_sign' => <bool>,
'disabled' => <bool>,
'expired' => <bool>,
'revoked' => <bool>,
),
?>
porjo38 at yahoo dot com dot au ¶
11 years ago
It appears that listing *all* keys is not possible:
<?php
$gpg -> keyinfo(); // throws an error
$gpg -> keyinfo('*'); // is matched literally, not treated as a shell wildcard
$gpg -> keyinfo('.*'); // is matched literally, not treated as a regex wildcard
?>
This seems like a glaring omission to me.
