apc_store

(PECL apc >= 3.0.0)

apc_store Cache a variable in the data store

说明

apc_store ( string $key , mixed $var [, int $ttl = 0 ] ) : bool
apc_store ( array $values [, mixed $unused = NULL [, int $ttl = 0 ]] ) : array

缓存一个变量到APC中

Note: 与PHP中其他的机制不同,使用apc_store() 存储的变量 在不同的请求之间一直持久存在(直到从缓存系统中移除)。

参数

key

存储缓存变量使用的名称.key是唯一的,所以 两个值使用同一个 key,原来的将被新的值覆盖。

var

The variable to store

ttl

生存时间;在缓存中存储varttl秒, 在ttl秒过去后,存储的变量将会从缓存中擦除(在下一次请求时), 如果没有设置ttl(或者ttl0), 变量将一直存活到被手动移除为止,除此之外不在缓存中的可能原因是, 缓存系统使用clear,或者restart等。

values

Names in key, variables in value.

返回值

成功时返回 TRUE, 或者在失败时返回 FALSE。 Second syntax returns array with error keys.

范例

Example #1 apc_store() 例子

<?php
$bar 
'BAR';
apc_store('foo'$bar);
var_dump(apc_fetch('foo'));
?>

以上例程会输出:

string(3) "BAR"

参见

add a note add a note

User Contributed Notes 15 notes

up
18
JaskaS
17 years ago
if you want to store array of objects in apc use ArrayObject wrapper (PHP5).

<?php
$objs
= array();
$objs[] = new TestClass();
$objs[] = new TestClass();
$objs[] = new TestClass();

//Doesn't work
apc_store('objs',$objs,60);
$tmp = apc_fetch('objs');
print_r($tmp);

//Works
apc_store('objs',new ArrayObject($objs),60);
$tmp = apc_fetch('objs');
print_r($tmp->getArrayCopy());

?>
up
3
sebastian at 7val dot com
16 years ago
Note that since APC 3.0.15 or 3.0.16, the time-to-live-feature does not work within the same request (see http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=13331).
up
3
MaxTheDragon at home dot nl
12 years ago
When specifying a ttl (Time-To-Live), you are allowed to use negative values. This causes a stored entry to be invalidated immediately, but note that it will not physically be removed until you read (eg. apc_fetch or apc_exists) it:

<?php
apc_store
('testKey', 'testValue', -1); // ... or any negative integer.

// at this point, the key exists physically but is already technically invalidated by the ttl.

$test = apc_fetch('testKey'); // $test equals false.

// at this point, the key no longer exists physically.
?>

Although you could mimic apc_delete with a negative TTL (like when dealing with cookies), note that the difference is that apc_delete actually physically removes the entry.

This example comes in handy when you want to unit-test a class that uses APC. It's faster to use a negative TTL than a positive in combination with a sleep call to test whether the cache entry has actually been deleted. Other than that I can't think of any situations in which you could use this example, but I'm simply pointing out that doing this will not generate Exceptions or errors.
up
3
alexey dot maksutov at gmail dot com
11 years ago
APC does serialization/deserialization during store/fetch operations as well as it calls __sleep()/__wakeup(), or Serializable::serialize()/Serializable::unserialize(). Tested on PHP 5.4.1.0.
up
1
cycne001 at hotmail dot com
4 years ago
simple implementation with persistence using tmpfs on Linux system

<?php
   
//  Escrito por Renato Martins
   
   
define('MYSHM_PATH', "/dev/shm/.php_myshm");
    @
mkdir(MYSHM_PATH);
       
    function
shm_set($key, $val, $ttl = 0) {
       
$key = md5($key);
        if (
$ttl > 0 ) $ttl = time() + $ttl;
        return
file_put_contents(MYSHM_PATH . "/$key" , serialize([$ttl, $val]) , LOCK_EX);
    }
   
    function
shm_get($key) {
       
$key = md5($key);
       
$f = MYSHM_PATH . "/$key";
       
$v = unserialize(@file_get_contents($f));
        if ( !
$v || ($v[0] > 0 && time() > $v[0]) ) {
            @
unlink($f);
            return
null;
        }
       
        return
$v[1];
    }

   
shm_set('teste', ['a', 222 ,453] , 60);
   
print_rshm_get('teste')  );

?>
up
0
mys5droid at gmail dot com
8 years ago
"Note APC version 3.1.3 there is a bug (http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=16814) that will display a cache slam averted warning for all writes to a cache var that exists. Slam checking can be disabled by setting apc.slam_defense = 0."

This is not a bug. Surprisingly, it has been assigned a bug id.It is obviously not a bug, because there is a man-made error message, as well as a switch to turn off slam checking.

Think about it, would you release code which modifies core system files without warning? No, you would make a warning for the user. Same is true with shared memory.

I happen to think it is a good feature, it tells you are overwriting something... And if you dislike it, turn it off using that setting, or use an @ in front of the function calls...
up
0
brunohass2303 at gmail dot com
11 years ago
Functions to update arrays and get the values from an unique key.

<?php

function apc_array_store($apc_var, $key, $valor)
{
   
$apcTemp = array();
   
    if (
$valor == NULL ) return FALSE;
   
    if (
$apcTemp = apc_fetch($apc_var) ) // Verifica se a variavel $apc_var existe no cache APC
   
{ // Se existir
       
if ( !array_key_exists($apcTemp, $key) ) // Verifica se a chave $key existe no array
           
$apcTemp[$key] = $valor; // Se $valor não for NULL, adiciona no array
       
       
if ( apc_store("$apc_var", $apcTemp) ) // Tenta atualizar o array no cache
            
return TRUE;
        else return
FALSE;
    }
    else
    {
// Se a variavel $apc_var nao existir no cache adiciona
       
if ( $valor == NULL ) // Se $valor for NULL retorna FALSE
           
return FALSE;
        else
        {   
// Se $valor não for NULL, cria o array
           
$apcTemp[$key] = $valor;
           
            if (
apc_add("$apc_var", $apcTemp) ) // Tenta adicionar o array no cache
                
return TRUE;
            else return
FALSE;
        }
    }
   
}

function
apc_array_fetch($apc_var, $key)
{

    if (
$apcTemp = apc_fetch($apc_var) ) // Verifica se a variavel $apc_var existe no cache APC
   
{ // Se existir
       
if ( !array_key_exists($apcTemp, $key) ) // Verifica se a chave $key existe no array
               
return FALSE; // Se não existir retorna FALSE
           
else
                return
$apcTemp[$key]; // Se existir retorna o valor
   
}
    else
// Se não existir
       
return FALSE;
   
}

?>
up
0
danil dot gazizov at gmail dot com
12 years ago
Don't save empty arrays and empty values. Sometimes, you can get wrong apc_exists($someKey) result, that this key doesn't exists.
up
-1
eda-qa at disemia dot com
14 years ago
Note that the TTL only takes effect when you attempt to access the variable again (at least in my version).  That is, just issuing a new request to a page won't clear outdated items -- you have to call apc_fetch on that specific item.

If you call apc_info after the TTL of an item it will still be listed.

This is important if you are expecting items to be cleared to conserve memory.
up
-2
Roberto Spadim
17 years ago
be sure that setting FALSE values can be wrong returned from fetch since fetch return FALSE on errors
up
-1
php at tequilasolutions dot com
18 years ago
Seems to be no (easy) way at the to know how old a value fetched is and to check whether it is out of date.

I've made these wrappers so that you can fetch and store values based on a udt returned from get_last_modified_date() which should return a udt of when your data was last changed, and hence needs junking out of the cache.

<?php
function apc_fetch_udt($key){
   
$g = apc_fetch($key);
    if (
$g){
        list(
$udt,$val) = $g;
        if (
get_last_modified_date()<$udt) {
           
$val = unserialize($val);
            return
$val;
        } else {
           
apc_delete($key);
        }
    }
}
function
apc_store_udt($key,$g){
   
$udt = time();
   
$g   = serialize($g);
   
$apc = array($udt,$g);
   
apc_store($key, $apc);
}
?>
up
-1
pere dot cil dot remove dot this at wanadoo dot fr
12 years ago
Note that caching resources is not possible; even if the apc cache doesn't seems to call the serialize / unserialize functions, that doesn't means that resources can be cached!

Small non-working example:

<?php
// Setter code
$r = fopen( '/tmp/test.txt', 'r' );
var_dump( $r );
apc_store( 'test', $r );
?>

<?php
// Getter code
$d = apc_fetch( 'test' );
var_dump( $d );
echo
fread( $d, 1024 );
?>

var_dump( $d ) returns Resource #n of type (Unknown). The resource is still here, but unavailable.
up
-3
Dominik Deobald / Interdose
14 years ago
It might be interesting to note that storing an object in the cache does not serialize the object, i.e. does not call the __sleep()/__wakeup() or serialize()/unserialize() methods.
up
-6
TaRaKa
14 years ago
Note APC version 3.1.3 there is a bug (http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=16814) that will display a cache slam averted warning for all writes to a cache var that exists. Slam checking can be disabled by setting apc.slam_defense = 0.
To Top